Driver-based budgets, rolling forecasts, scenario planning, and operational planning models built in Workday Adaptive Planning, designed to reflect how your business actually plans, not how the template works by default.
Workday Adaptive Planning handles the full FP&A cycle (annual budgeting, rolling forecasts, long-range planning, and scenario analysis) when the underlying model is designed correctly. Most models that underperform were built to go live, not to last.
Revenue, opex, headcount, capex, and cash flow budgeting on a single Adaptive model, with driver logic that connects assumptions to outputs automatically rather than through manual formula maintenance.
12-month rolling forecast with actuals loading automatically from Workday Finance each period, so the forecast always reflects what has actually happened rather than what was planned to happen.
Best case, base case, and downside scenarios with shared driver structures, so a change to one key assumption (revenue growth rate, headcount, FX) flows through all three scenarios simultaneously.
Departmental operating expense budgets with cost centre hierarchy, headcount-driven cost lines, and allocation logic for shared services, designed so a reorg doesn't require a model rebuild.
Capital expenditure planning with project-level tracking, depreciation schedules, and capitalisation logic connected to the financial plan, not maintained in a separate spreadsheet.
3-5 year strategic plan built on the same Adaptive model as the annual budget, with shared driver assumptions so the long-range view and the annual plan stay connected as assumptions change.
The most common reason Adaptive Planning budgeting models underperform is that the driver logic was built generically (percentage-of-revenue, flat growth rates), rather than reflecting the actual operational assumptions your finance team uses. We map those assumptions first, then build the model around them.
We review your current budgeting cycle, driver assumptions, data sources, reporting requirements, and the specific points where the current model fails finance, before designing anything.
Dimension structure, driver logic, version relationships, and sheet architecture designed and documented before any configuration begins in Adaptive Planning.
Model built against your specification, tested with prior-year actuals from Workday Finance, validated against prior budgets, and handed over with documentation and training.
Workday Adaptive Planning's Predictive Forecaster and Illuminate anomaly detection work directly within the budgeting and forecasting model, flagging variance patterns, predicting likely actuals, and highlighting accounts that are drifting from plan. We configure and validate these native AI features as part of every budgeting model build, not as an optional add-on.
A line-item budget asks managers to enter numbers for each account. A driver-based budget asks them to enter the operational assumptions (headcount, revenue per unit, contract count) and calculates the financial outcome automatically. Driver-based models are faster to update, easier to scenario-plan, and produce forecasts that connect operational decisions to financial outcomes rather than just recording financial targets.
Yes. This is one of the things Workday Adaptive Planning does well when the model is designed for it. Actuals from Workday Finance load automatically each period, the rolling forecast recalculates, and finance reviews the updated view rather than rebuilding it. The design decision that matters is how the version architecture handles the shift from plan to forecast periods. We design this explicitly rather than leaving it to the default.
Workday Illuminate analyses historical actuals patterns and flags accounts where the current forecast is likely to be wrong before the period closes, giving finance time to investigate rather than discovering the variance after the fact. The Adaptive Predictive Forecaster generates statistical forecasts from actuals history that finance can compare against their own assumptions. Both features work within the existing model and require no separate data pipeline.
Yes, and we design for this from the start rather than retrofitting rolling forecast capability into a budget-only model. The version architecture (how budget, rolling forecast, actuals, and scenario versions relate to each other) is the key design decision. Getting this right means finance can run their full planning cycle from one model rather than maintaining separate budget and forecast files.
Budget model not working the way you need it to?
Get a Model Audit →We’ll map your planning process and give you a model design before any configuration begins.